A school’s social character comes from perpetuating a group’s class function

Evidence

The traditional school was oligarchic because it was intended for the new generation of the ruling class, destined to rule in its turn: but it was not oligarchic in its mode of teaching. It is not the fact that the pupils learn how to rule there, nor the fact that it tends to produce gifted men, which gives a particular type of school its social character. This social character is determined by the fact that each social group has its own type of school, intended to perpetuate a specific traditional function, ruling or subordinate. If one wishes to break this pattern one needs, instead of multiplying and grading different types of vocational school, to create a single type of formative school (primary-secondary) which would take the child up to the threshold of his choice of job, forming him during this time as a person capable of thinking, studying, and ruling—or controlling those who rule. — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 365

Categorization

Category: Definitional Content

  • DEFINE: Distinguishes the content of teaching from its social character — the key move that lets Gramsci link schooling to reproduction of class structure.
  • XREF: This is the structural mechanism behind institutional reproduction the reader will find echoed in Islamophobia readings on how education systems shape exclusionary worldviews.

Broader Connections