Structural classroom hierarchy predates any student choice to invoke identity

Evidence

Fuss makes the point that “the artificial boundary between insider and outsider necessarily contains rather than disseminates know ledge.” While I share this perception, I am disturbed that she never acknowledges that racism, sexism, and class elitism shape the structure of classrooms, creating a lived reality of insider versus outsider that is predetermined, often in place before any class discussion begins. There is rarely any need for marginalized groups to bring this binary opposition into the classroom because it is usually already operating. They may simply use it in the service of their concerns. Looked at from a sympathetic standpoint, the assertion of an excluding essentialism on the part of students from marginalized groups can be a strategic response to domination and to colonization, a survival strategy that may in deed inhibit discussion even as it rescues those students from negation. — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress, 169

Categorization

  • SEED: An essay on pedagogy: how classrooms replicate insider-outsider binaries before discussion starts, making faculty hand-wringing over student essentialism miss the real dynamic.
  • XREF: connects to: Class background shapes whether students believe their voices deserve academic respect — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as…, 285; Treating the classroom as static and repeatable serves institutionalized domination — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as…, 314; Surveillance-based schooling constructs individuality only as a position in a sequence — Timothy Mitchell, Colonising Egypt, 262 (+5 more)

Broader Connections