Philip S. Gorski and Samuel L. Perry — The Flag and the Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy
72 published claims from this book.
- “Evangelical” now functions chiefly as a Republican Party identity label
- A common external threat does not reliably unite polarized publics
- A second American insurrection would likely be larger and more violent
- Being unable to name oppression’s source intensifies its psychological harm
- Big money and evangelical activists jointly funded the Tea Party
- Black conservative Protestants align with white evangelicals on Christian nationalism measures
- Black evangelicals experienced Trump’s election as a betrayal by their own churches
- Christian conservatives now justify discrimination via rights language rather than morality
- Christian nationalism fuses free-market capitalism into American Christian identity
- Christian nationalism independently predicts pandemic-era immigrant scapegoating among whites
- Christian nationalism is a global, not uniquely American, phenomenon
- Christian nationalism is measured through survey agreement statements
- Christian nationalism predicted not just noncompliance but reversed precaution behavior
- Christian nationalism predicts ultra-conservatism mainly for white Americans, not Black or Hispanic
- Christian nationalism strongly predicts pro-free-market attitudes among Americans.
- Christian nationalism survey items predict racial attitudes even though they mention no race
- Christian nationalist belief predicts Civil War revisionism and monument defense
- Christian nationalist founding claims are historically false.
- Christian nationalist history is factually wrong, not merely interpretively different.
- Christian nationalist rhetoric frames socialism as anti-biblical and anti-American
- Christian nationalist rhetoric uses coded ethno-traditionalism to mean white rule
- Christian right leaders framed pandemic restrictions as unconstitutional fear-based tyranny.
- Countering white Christian nationalism requires a cross-ideological popular front.
- COVID restrictions were opposed by the right on economic-withdrawal grounds, not health ones.
- COVID-19’s shared mortal threat deepened rather than healed American polarization
- Deep stories feel truest precisely when contradicting recorded history
- Demographic decline and inequality drive American political rupture
- Historical misinformation alone cannot explain Christian nationalists’ wrong answers
- Ideological identity, not ignorance, drives whites’ wrong history answers
- Ideology, not ignorance, drives culture-war knowledge gaps among religious conservatives
- Multiracial democracy and white Christian nationhood are logically incompatible in the US
- Nationalism masquerades as patriotism by claiming defensive aims
- Online racial abuse triggers measurable physiological stress responses
- Patriotism means constitutional loyalty while nationalism means tribal loyalty against an outgroup
- Perceived white Christian persecution drives opposition to voter access
- Racial anxiety about Obama ignited the Tea Party movement
- Racial dog whistles replaced explicit slurs after the civil rights movement
- Reactionaries act pro-actively while progressives stay reactive
- Reactionary movements embrace radical change to defend or restore hierarchies.
- Rural white MAGA support rests on a false line-cutting narrative
- Tea Partiers treat the Constitution as a sacred text akin to the Bible
- The 2020 DHS threat assessment named white supremacists the top domestic threat
- The Christian label often masks tribal politics among secular whites
- The Christian Right has long openly pursued suppression of rival voters
- The Christian-nation founding story contradicts documented history
- The founding fathers held diverse religious views and drew on secular sources
- The word Christian has become racially coded for conservative whites since Reagan
- Trump blamed China rather than his own administration for the pandemic
- Trump scapegoated minorities to deflect COVID-19 blame
- White Christian identity is conflated in conservative rhetoric with whiteness itself
- White Christian nationalism drives right-wing populism in America
- White Christian nationalism explains seemingly contradictory Christian political behavior
- White Christian nationalism fuses race and faith into one ethno-traditionalist identity
- White Christian nationalism has cycled through a series of shifting internal and external enemies
- White Christian nationalism in America mirrors secularized versions across Europe and Latin America.
- White Christian nationalism is a defensible empirical category, not a slur
- White Christian nationalism masks racial anxiety behind religious identity claims
- White Christian nationalism operates as an adaptable narrative, not fixed beliefs
- White Christian nationalism repels people from church more than progressive ideas do
- White Christian nationalism shaped which authorities Americans trusted during the pandemic
- White Christian nationalism treats voting as a right limited to worthy groups
- White Christian nationalism went unnoticed by both its adherents and its critics
- White Christian nationalism, not mere distrust, drove evangelical COVID vaccine refusal.
- White Christian nationalist beliefs predict perceived anti-white discrimination
- White Christian nationalist policy positions lack a biblical basis
- White Christian nationalists answer history questions wrongly while Black ones abstain
- White Christian nationalists blamed Black Americans rather than social conditions for COVID disparities
- White Christian nationalists sincerely believe whites and Christians are the most persecuted in America
- White Christians supported Trump despite his apparent moral violations
- White evangelical support for Trump rose between 2016 and 2020
- White politicians shifted from racial slurs to coded language after civil rights
- Whiteness alone links Christian nationalist belief to right-wing political mobilization