John Drury and Evangelos Ntontis — A SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL OF COLLECTIVE RESILIENCE IN EMERGENT GROUPS
13 published claims from this book.
- An ambiguous, unconcretized threat fragments rather than unites a crowd.
- Calling communities ‘resilient’ can let authorities evade their support duties
- Collective resilience theory now yields practical guidance for disaster practitioners.
- Existing friendship and family bonds shape cooperative evacuation behavior.
- Expecting support from fellow survivors enables coordinated collective action.
- Flood survivors’ shared identity predicts their well-being through expected support months later
- London bomb survivors formed solidarity with strangers within minutes of the blast.
- Pre-disaster social bonds cannot explain solidarity among strangers during crises.
- Resilience is an emergent group process, not a pre-existing personality trait.
- Shared social identity is the causal variable predicting solidarity among disaster strangers.
- Social capital both retains residents and can worsen discrimination after disasters
- The solidarity model extends beyond disasters to political violence and repression.
- Unequal disaster treatment by authorities re-marginalizes minority residents and dissolves unity