Western modernity is a hegemonic particularism disguised as universalism

Evidence

From this perspective, he insists, we can then better see how a variety of vernacular modernities might displace the binary division between a static concept of fixed “Tradition” and an abstracted vision of “Enlightenment Modernity.” Thus, rather than accepting the conventional story in which particularistic backward traditions are replaced by a philosophically based set of universal principles, what we see is a process in which what had initially been a specifically Western form of particularism came to successfully hegemonize large parts of the globe while presenting itself as a form of global universalism. — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2, 153

Categorization

  • XREF: This is the Orientalism/Gramsci convergence: universalism as hegemonized particularism echoes how ‘common sense’ presents class-bound interests as neutral. — connects to: Modernity and democracy are contested concepts, not checkable off-the-shelf goods — Edward W. Said, Orientalism, 31; Western imperial particularism was disguised as universal civilization — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity…, 372; The West concept classifies, represents, compares, and evaluates societies — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity…, 509 (+24 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: The inversion — that what parades as universal Enlightenment is really a successful hegemonic particularism — is the load-bearing epistemic move for the whole field.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity…, 153

Broader Connections