Nationalism is modern in fact but ancient in claim, universal and particular

Evidence

Theorists of nationalism have often been perplexed, not to say irritated, by these three paradoxes: (1) The objective modernity of nations to the historian’s eye vs. their subjective antiquity in the eyes of nationalists. (2) The formal universality of nationality as a socio-cultural concept – in the modern world everyone can, should, will ‘have’ a nationality, as he or she ‘has’ a gender – vs. the irremediable particularity of its concrete manifestations, such that, by definition, ‘Greek’ nationality is sui generis. (3) The ‘political’ power of nationalisms vs. their philosophical poverty and even incoherence. — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities, 35

Categorization

  • DEFINE: The three paradoxes are the field’s core problem-set — the apparent antiquity of nations despite their objective modernity, inherent to how nationalism legitimates itself.
  • XREF: connects to: European nationalisms imagined themselves as waking from sleep toward ancestral glory — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on…, 726; The awakening trope explained the anomaly of Europe’s late nationalism by claiming antiquity — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on…, 727; Nationalism’s invented antiquity structurally aligns with modern autobiography’s inner premises — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on…, 25 (+7 more)

Broader Connections