Volunteers suppress public criticism to secure piecemeal institutional alliances
Evidence
Alliances came piecemeal, one precisely defined issue at a time, not as a whole movement working on a range of interconnected issues.’* Powerful institutions like the police were crucial allies. No matter how many drunken brawls local police officers had, their seal of approval was important — more important than the volunteers’. Publicly minded critique evaporated in the process of making alliances like this one. — Nina Eliasoph, Avoiding politics, 313
Categorization
- XREF: Connects to why shared projects avoid out-group framing — alliance-building works against honest critique, relevant to reader’s core question about solidarity mechanisms. — connects to: Volunteer groups lack respect for open-ended discussion of unresolved issues — Nina Eliasoph, Avoiding politics: how Americans…, 221; Justice-framed speech is taboo in volunteer groups while piecemeal framing is acceptable. — Nina Eliasoph, Avoiding politics: how Americans…, 269; Volunteer groups suppress political talk even though members privately care — Nina Eliasoph, Avoiding politics: how Americans…, 192 (+7 more)
Broader Connections
- Volunteer groups suppress political talk even though members privately care
#corroborates(0.92) — Nina Eliasoph, Avoiding politics, 192 - Volunteer groups suppress politically troubling topics to protect group cheer
#expands(0.85) — Nina Eliasoph, “Close to home”, 96 - Volunteers collectively redirected each other’s political criticisms into private moods rather than public problems.
#corroborates(0.85) — Nina Eliasoph, “Close to home”, 63 - Reform agencies muted criticism once their friends held power and shared patronage
#corroborates(0.85) — Robert A. Caro, The Power Broker, 362 - Volunteers build egalitarian togetherness by suppressing distinctive principled talking
#qualifies(0.80) — Nina Eliasoph, Avoiding politics, 334 - Volunteers suppress political talk because it would sink their feeling of empowerment
#complicates(0.78) - Activists suppress their systemic political analyses when speaking publicly.
#exemplifies(0.75) — Nina Eliasoph, Avoiding politics, 88