Movement leaders suppress internal critiques to protect unity

Evidence

Criticism of (hetero) sexism within the civil rights movement or in ethnic communities had been discouraged by (male, heterosexual) leaders out of fear that it might undermine the unity of the movement and damage its reputation (Clark et al., 2018). Such an essentialist understanding of anti‐racist politics excludes and makes invisible women, gays and lesbians of color (Ransby, 2015, 2018). — Silke Roth, Intersectionality and coalitions in…, 151

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly relevant to the reader’s survey question about whether solidarity requires suppressing internal heterogeneity — this is a real-world case of homogenization for the sake of unity. — connects to: Consensus-based protest groups deliberately suppress individual prominence to preserve collective identity. — Vincent Bevins, If We Burn: The Mass Protest Decade and…, 358; Suppressing criticism of comrades betrays rather than expresses solidarity; Community leaders publicly excuse internal aggression to preserve a unified front — Manuel Borutta and Jan C. Jansen, Vertriebene and Pieds-Noirs in Postwar…, 659 (+7 more)
  • SEED: Bonus angle: the tension between strategic unity and internal honesty in movements, historically and today.

Broader Connections