Ungrounded faith in government benefits the powerful, not the faithful

Evidence

To give an account of trust in government on analogy with trust in individuals requires two classes of argument. First, we must give an account of the trustworthiness of government agents. Second, we must account for the knowledge citizens are likely to have of such trustworthiness. In the second account, the central problem is the translation of individual-to-individual relationships to individual-to-group or individual-to-institution relationships. What is called trust in government may in fact be something short of trust as we experience it in interpersonal relations. This is confidence, or what we might call quasi trust. It is based on reasons for believing government agents to be trustworthy, reasons that do not involve direct relationships with the quasi trusting citizen. — Russell Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness, 703 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Trust in government is really quasi-trust or confidence, not trust — Russell Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness, 703; Revolutionary regimes attract blind faith, not grounded trust; Trust in government is not a major working factor in modern society (+5 more)

Broader Connections