Revolutionary regimes attract blind faith, not grounded trust

Related

• Trust in rulers is a realistic assessment of irreversibility, not psychic compulsion (similarity 0.87)
• Distrust of government is easier to ground rationally than trust (similarity 0.85)
• Dominant powers benefit from engineering their subjects’ inability to trust (similarity 0.84)
• Colonial rulers sincerely believed their own religious and self-interested ideology (similarity 0.83)
• Trust is merely evidence-based expectation while trustworthiness is motivational (similarity 0.83)
• Trust necessarily stays moored in expectations and interests (similarity 0.83)
• Political movements must engage the religious terrain where religion is the dominant ideological domain. (similarity 0.82)
• Institutional and legal constraints give people strong external incentives to be trustworthy (similarity 0.82)
• Faith in God and faith in government substitute for each other (similarity 0.82)
• The concept of ideology was born torn between historical relativism and universal truth. (similarity 0.82)
• Parasitic cheating thrives where trust is generalized from trustworthy settings (similarity 0.82)
• Deceitful trust, once established, obliges its user into genuine trustworthiness (similarity 0.82)
• Trust in government is not a major working factor in modern society (similarity 0.81)
• Distrust is self-reinforcing because it starves itself of corrective information (similarity 0.81)
• Trust is inductively corrigible by objective experience (similarity 0.81)