Under crushing uncertainty, litigants read chance events as providential signs about their case.

Evidence

The coincidence seemed at first quite remarkable to Schlichtmann. And then, after a few moments, he decided it was not a mere coincidence at all, but a matter of destiny. Clearly, this Professor Nesson, author of articles that the judge himself cited, was the one whom Providence had chosen. — , Harr Jonathan - A Civil Action, 1345

Categorization

  • QUESTION: How much of a gambling litigant’s persistence rests on this kind of providential pattern-finding — and where does it tip into self-destruction?
  • XREF: connects to: Litigants’ sense of control over complex cases is often an illusion. — , Harr Jonathan - A Civil Action , 1183; Litigants shift between courts and legislatures depending on their expected chances — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 3143; Most litigation arises because the meaning of law is uncertain — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 195 (+17 more)

Broader Connections