The West-civilizes-the-Eastern-despot claim chains climate theory through Orientalism to modernization theory

Evidence

The classic version of this frame states that Islamic “civilization” is not capable of democracy and that it can only produce despotism. As we saw in Chapter 1, the notion of “Oriental despotism” was developed in the eighteenth century by writers like Montesquieu, who argued that the hot climate of the East made Orientals submissive and thus unable to resist tyranny. Orientalists put this theory on a seemingly sounder academic footing by stating that despotism was one of the core values of “Islamic civilization” and that political revolution and resistance to bad government was alien to Arab and Muslim cultures. Modernization theory made this notion more scientific by suggesting that “traditional” societies were characterized by hierarchical systems of power. Thus, change would never come from within, and it was the burden of the West to civilize, modernize, and democratize the East. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 360

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • XREF: Traced lineage from Montesquieu through Orientalism to modernization theory; ties to reader’s ch6/ch8/ch18 notes on the incapacity-for-democracy frame descendant chain.

Broader Connections