Coercive civilizational labels like West and Islam serve immediate political purposes

Evidence

Perhaps it is too much to hope that some people here and in the Islamic world may discover the deplorable limits of coercive labels like “the West” and “Islam.” Perhaps it is too much to expect that these labels and the frameworks supporting them will over time lose their imprisoning force, but it may be possible that “Islam” will seem less monolithic and frightening and more the result of interpretations that serve our immediate political purposes and characterize our anxieties, whether “we” happen to be Muslims or non-Muslims. Once we finally grasp the sheer power and the subjective components of interpretation, and once we recognize that many of the things we know are ours in more ways than we normally admit, we are well on our way to disposing of some naïveté, a great deal of bad faith, and many myths about ourselves and the world we live in. — Edward W. Said, Covering Islam, 223

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: Dense formulation of how interpretation, self-interest, and political anxiety converge to construct ‘Islam’ — the book’s entire argument condensed into a few sentences that reward rereading.
  • XREF: Connects to Said’s Orientalism thesis about how ‘the West’ constructs ‘the Orient’ as its own self-image, and to the reader’s earlier curation of power-knowledge frameworks.