The social character of Islamic practice went unrecognized by medieval Christian writers

Evidence

This brings out forcibly the contrast between what was observed and what was inferred; between what was accepted on evidence and what was believed even without an adequate authority. At the beginning of this chapter it was said that both modification and confirmation of theory were found in practice. What is really remarkable is that this did not happen more. — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1281 (#expands, via linked claim)

Most conspicuous to us is the inability of any of these systems of thought [European Christian] to provide a fully satisfying explanation of the phenomenon they had set out to explain [Islam]—still less to influence the course of practical events in a decisive way. At a practical level, events never turned out either so well or so ill as the most intelligent observers predicted; and it is perhaps worth noticing that they never turned out better than when the best judges confidently expected a happy ending. Was there any progress [in Christian knowledge of Islam]? I must express my conviction that there was. Even if the solution of the problem remained obstinately hidden from sight, the statement of the problem became more complex, more rational, and more related to experience.… The scholars who labored at the problem of Islam in the Middle Ages failed to find the solution they sought and desired; but they developed habits of mind and powers of comprehension which, in other men and in other fields, may yet deserve success. — Edward W. Said, Orientalism, 168 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Christian polemicists portrayed medieval Muslim sexuality as wholly unregulated; Medieval Christian polemicists fixated on Islam’s legal theory while knowing nothing of its practice; Medieval writers mostly ignored that shared terms hid different meanings (+8 more)

Broader Connections