Christians misread Islamic ritual by assuming it mirrored their own

Evidence

My point, however, is to emphasize the truth that the Orientalist, as much as anyone in the European West who thought about or experienced the Orient, performed this kind of mental operation. But what is more important still is the limited vocabulary and imagery that impose themselves as a consequence. The reception of Islam in the West is a perfect case in point, and has been admirably studied by Norman Daniel. One constraint acting upon Christian thinkers who tried to understand Islam was an analogical one; since Christ is the basis of Christian faith, it was assumed—quite incorrectly—that Mohammed was to Islam as Christ was to Christianity. Hence the polemic name “Mohammedanism” given to Islam, and the automatic epithet “imposter” applied to Mohammed. — Edward W. Said, Orientalism, 165 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Christian thinking forced Islam into Christian analogical categories, misrepresenting it; Christian observers misread Islamic prostration as heaven-directed hand-raising — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 2341; The Christian image of Islam served Christian self-understanding, not Islam itself — Edward W. Said, Orientalism, 165 (+12 more)

Broader Connections