The prison’s failure, reform, and discipline form one simultaneous carceral system

Evidence

One must not, therefore, regard the prison, its ‘failure’ and its more or less successful reform as three successive stages. One should think rather of a simultaneous system that historically has been superimposed on the juridical deprivation of liberty; a fourfold system comprising: the additional, disciplinary element of the prison – the element of ‘super-power’; the production of an objectivity, a technique, a penitentiary ‘rationality’ – the element of auxiliary knowledge; the de facto reintroduction, if not actual increase, of a criminality that the prison ought to destroy – the element of inverted efficiency; lastly, the repetition of a ‘reform’ that is isomorphic, despite its ‘idealism’, with the disciplinary functioning of the prison – the element of utopian duplication. It is this complex ensemble that constitutes the ‘carceral system’, not only the institution of the prison, with its walls, its staff, its regulations and its violence. — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 418

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines ‘carceral system’ as a fourfold simultaneous ensemble, not the prison institution alone.
  • XREF: connects to: Prisons resemble schools, factories, and hospitals because one disciplinary model unifies them — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 353; The prison’s disciplinary excess over legal detention was present from its birth — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 379; The penitentiary apparatus substitutes the delinquent for the offender. — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 386 (+13 more)

Broader Connections