The log-normal assumption may have been self-undermining through portfolio insurance.

Evidence

There is a tempting argument that the assumption of log-normality was self-undermining, via its incorporation in the techniques of portfolio insurance. Unfortunately from the viewpoint of analytical neatness, however, the extent of the contribution of portfolio insurance to the 1987 crash is unclear. — Donald MacKenzie & Yuval Millo, Constructing a Market, Performing Theory, 191

Categorization

  • SEED: Angle: a performativity story where a theory’s own adoption destabilizes the very distribution it assumes — the model becomes its own failure mode, though the empirical evidence is murky.
  • QUESTION: What does the empirical literature actually say about portfolio insurance’s role in the 1987 crash? The author defers on the size of the contribution.
  • XREF: connects to: Portfolio insurance’s real risk was internal self-impact, not external shocks. — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 807; Portfolio insurance designed to limit losses can amplify market volatility. — Shapiro, Susan P., The Social Control of Impersonal Trust, 144; Market conditions moved toward the model’s assumptions partly because of the model itself — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 1155 (+2 more)

Broader Connections