The imagined Orient’s internal ‘dislocation’ is the position from which Orientalists justify their authority

Evidence

As Hussain states, this process established ‘an absolute and systematic difference between the West … and the Orient, which is aberrant, undeveloped and inferior’. More worrying for him though, and in offering some explanation of what was to follow, Hussain explains that what emerged was a notion and preconception of the Orient that was ‘uniform and incapable of defining itself … either to be feared … or to be controlled’. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 188 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: The Orientalist’s authority required disengagement from lived Oriental life; Shared intellectual authority over the Orient unified otherwise divergent national Orientalisms; Orientalist knowledge cycles into control over an Orient it activated (+7 more)

Related

• Orientalism fixes the Orient as passive reactor to the West’s self-assigned agency (similarity 0.92)
• The Orientalist’s internal East-West conflict erases Oriental agency (similarity 0.91)
• Shared intellectual authority over the Orient unified otherwise divergent national Orientalisms (similarity 0.91)
• The Orient is constituted as absence while the Orientalist constitutes himself as presence (similarity 0.91)
• Orientalism defines the Orient as innately resistant to change and modernity (similarity 0.91)
• Orientalism’s essentialism hides both historical change and the Orientalist’s interests (similarity 0.90)
• Latent Orientalism denies the Orient any possibility of development or transformation (similarity 0.90)
• Orientalism fixed the Orient as uniform, undeveloped, and incapable of self-definition (similarity 0.89)
• Orientalist science and personal utterance alike erase the modern Orient’s human reality (similarity 0.89)
• Essentialist Orientalist vision erases historical development in favor of unchanging geographic types. (similarity 0.89)
• European representation of the Orient outweighs actual Oriental lived experience (similarity 0.88)
• Orientalism presents Arabs as static types rather than historical agents (similarity 0.88)
• Single discrete studies confirmed the Orient’s total essential character (similarity 0.88)
• Orientalist scholarship edited the Orient by excising whatever offended European norms (similarity 0.87)
• Even sympathetic Orientalists denied the Orient modernity by casting it as ancient and Semitic. (similarity 0.87)

Broader Connections

• The Orient is constituted as absence while the Orientalist constitutes himself as presence #expands (0.82)
• Shared intellectual authority over the Orient unified otherwise divergent national Orientalisms #expands (0.80)
• Orientalism fixed the Orient as uniform, undeveloped, and incapable of self-definition #expands (0.80) — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 188
• Orientalist knowledge cycles into control over an Orient it activated #expands (0.78)
• Orientalist authority requires dispossessing prior knowledge while claiming perfect authenticity #expands (0.78)
• Orientalism is studied via its internal consistency, not its correspondence to a real Orient #expands (0.75)
• Orientalism regularizes how the Orient is taught and administered #expands (0.75)
• Orientalism fixes the Orient as passive reactor to the West’s self-assigned agency #complicates (0.72)
• Orientalist writings assumed the Orient was inferior and childlike #expands (0.72) — Green, Todd H, The Fear of Islam_ An Introduction to…, 206