The future, time, and history each have their own history and a shared question.
Evidence
Yes, if we are to believe The Future of Hegel. And also time, time itself would have a history. And history then, history would also have a history, a singular history setting the stage for the protagonists of a philosophical gigantomachia already engaged over questions like: ‘What is history?’, ‘What is time’, ‘What is the future?’, ‘What is the authority of ‘What is …’ in all of these questions?’, ‘And how may we reflect on the being of this ‘is’ or on the present tense working here?’, etc. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 40
Categorization
Category: Definitional Content
- DEFINE: Frames the inquiry as a meta-question: the ‘is’ or present tense exercising within every question about future, time, and history.
Related
- The concept of the future itself has a history (similarity 0.87)
- Time’s meaning must be opened out because the future exceeds any single moment. (similarity 0.86)
- For Heidegger authentic future is time itself, not a moment of it (similarity 0.86)
- The future is understood both as coming time and as lasting posterity (similarity 0.84)
- The future arises only from reanimating the familiar and habitual (similarity 0.84)
- Hegel never reconciled the future’s chronological and logical-conceptual senses (similarity 0.84)
- Future carries a double sense of both what comes and what deserves to last (similarity 0.83)
- Hegel’s thought allegedly renounced all future by thinking time itself. (similarity 0.83)
- Hegel’s temporal movement spans both logical structure and historical unfolding (similarity 0.82)
- Past tense predicates require a recollecting synthesis anchored in present being (similarity 0.81)
- Thinking the future beyond ‘what is to come’ dissolves time as ordered moments (similarity 0.81)
- For Hegel time itself becomes rather than merely containing becoming. (similarity 0.81)
- Prior interpreters declared Hegel’s two futures irreconcilably contradictory (similarity 0.81)
- Hegel’s time concept fuses Aristotle’s now-analysis with Kant’s pure form of sensibility (similarity 0.81)
- The excess of time on time may itself be something other than time. (similarity 0.81)