The formal content distinction in sociology can only be illustrated, not yet defined

Evidence

We admit that we are discussing a particular viewpoint that helps to make the distinction between form and content. This viewpoint, for the time being, can be conveyed only by means of examples. Only much later may it be possible to grasp it by methods that are fully conceptualized and are sure guides to research. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 206

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s broader project on Simmel’s method — the blasé attitude and civil inattention are exactly such ‘examples’ of pure sociation that resist full conceptualization. — connects to: What is form in one context can be content in another. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 53; Social relations can be analyzed purely as formal configurations — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 208; Culture names the forms, not the content, of social relationships — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 882 (+3 more)

Broader Connections