Forms differ from Kantian categories by informing all experience and changing over time

Evidence

Contents are those aspects of existence which are determined in themselves, but as such contain neither structure nor the possibility of being apprehended by us in their immediacy. Forms are the synthesizing principles which select elements from the raw stuff of experience and shape them into determinate unities. In this respect forms are identical with Kant’s a priori categories of cognition; but they differ from the latter in two important respects. They inform not only the cognitive realm, but any and all dimensions of human experience. And they are not fixed and immutable, but emerge, develop, and perhaps disappear over time. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 21

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Precise definition of Simmel’s form/content distinction, central to his whole sociology.
  • XREF: Directly relevant to the essay on blasĂ© attitude — the blasĂ© attitude is itself a cognitive form shaping urban experience. — connects to: The tension between life and form drives cultural change. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 820; Structuralism inverts culturalism’s claim by making experience an effect of categories; Forms of interaction retain identity across varied contents and historical settings — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 202 (+2 more)

Broader Connections