The dismissal of reverse racism can silence what the marginalized are actually saying

Evidence

It is too easy to say that Denico’s discomfort around naming ‘race’ must simply be an effect of racism – even if this too was my own initial reaction. Indeed, my intuitive response to both Denico and Ricardo (who was also uncomfortable talking about ‘race’) was to say: ‘you cannot be racist to white people … that is not how it works’. But it is important to pause here and reflect on what is elided by this closure. Put simply, stating that black people cannot be racist to white people might shut down other, more productive, questions – as ever, questioning what is and is not racist is not the most fruitful line of enquiry – and it might represent a failure to really listen to what people like Denico and Ricardo are saying. — Luke de Noronha, The conviviality of the overpoliced,…, 61

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: A genuinely nuanced challenge to a progressive orthodoxy: the standard ‘black people can’t be racist’ retort may be a way of not listening rather than of defending the weak. Reframes an intellectual reflex as a possible closure of inquiry.
  • corroborated: 4 independent passages support this claim — Luke de Noronha, The conviviality of the overpoliced,…, 61
  • XREF: connects to: Convincing people racism is over ensures that racism persists — Ibram X. Kendi, Stamped from the Beginning: The…, 1142; Antiracialism requires forgetting and wiping out the vocabulary of racist harm; Antiracialism demands abandoning race discourse while leaving racist conditions untouched — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 123 (+4 more)

Broader Connections