Critiques of essentialism and identity politics can silence marginalized groups themselves

Evidence

Why does Fuss’s chapter ignore the subtle and overt ways essentialism is expressed from a location of privilege? Why does she primarily critique the misuses of essentialism by centering her analysis on marginalized groups? Doing so makes them the culprits for disrupting the classroom and making it an “unsafe” place. Is this not a conventional way the colonizer speaks of the colonized, the oppressor of the oppressed? … At the same time, I am concerned that critiques of identity politics not serve as the new, chic way to silence students from marginal groups. — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress, 168

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s broader library of colonial/anticolonial discourse critique — naming marginalized groups as the disrupters of classrooms mirrors how colonizers blame the colonized for unrest. — connects to: Totalizing critiques of identity threaten marginalized groups who name identity to resist domination — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as…, 162; A strategic essentialist identity can silence the very groups it unites — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity…, 248; Groups tolerate dissent unless it threatens identity-defining core beliefs — Roderick M. Kramer, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Robert W. Livingston, Social Cognition, Social Identity, and…, 1407 (+7 more)
  • SEED: An essay angle: how a well-intentioned scholarly critique of identity politics/essentialism quietly shifts blame onto the marginalized rather than the privileged, who employ the same strategies with institutional backing.

Broader Connections