The 1987 crash traumatized U.S. derivatives markets in ways absent elsewhere.

Evidence

What was learned in October 1987, therefore, was more than that stock markets could suddenly fall by previously unthinkable amounts: it was also that the consequences of such a fall could threaten the very existence of derivatives markets. Nor were all the effects of the crash short-lived: it was 1995 before stock options trading on the CBOE recovered to precrash volumes (CBOE/OCC 1998a, p. 12). It is this collective trauma, we conjecture, that sustains the skew. It is, for example, noteworthy that it has largely been an American phenomenon. The British options market did not respond to 1987 by developing a similar skew (Gemmill 1996). Although stock markets in the United Kingdom and around the world also crashed, the effects on the then-tiny British derivatives markets were nothing like as devastating. When a consistent skew did emerge in Britain in the first half of the 1990s, and also in Japan, it was only a third as intense as in the United States (Gemmill and Kamiyama 2001). — Donald MacKenzie & Yuval Millo, Constructing a Market, Performing Theory, 165

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: The 1987 crash taught options markets that unhedged put sales posed systemic risk — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 931; The 1987 crash’s minimal economic impact hides how traumatic it was for market participants. — Donald MacKenzie & Yuval Millo, Constructing a Market, Performing Theory, 155; Post-1987 option pricing may be rational given the crash’s trauma, not irrational. — Donald MacKenzie & Yuval Millo, Constructing a Market, Performing Theory, 155 (+2 more)

Broader Connections