Swedish post-prohibition data falsified opponents’ predictions of more abuse and criminalization

Evidence

The two central arguments against prohibition were that it would cause more abuse and that it would criminalize ordinary parents. The Swedish data addressed both claims. Child injury and death from assault did not rise. Court prosecutions did not explode. The actual rate of harm to children, and the actual rate of legal proceedings against parents, both moved in exactly the opposite direction from what the opponents predicted. This is not proof that prohibition caused the improvement. But it is definitive evidence that the opponents’ specific, falsifiable predictions were wrong. — , The Rod and the Child, 8998

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Post-prohibition reporting surges reflect awareness, not rising maltreatment — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 7274; Prohibitions without enforcement can make severe abuse harder to detect — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 7800; Swedish corporal punishment prevalence fell 96 percent within 42 years of prohibition — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 8351 (+3 more)

Broader Connections