Legal prohibition causes attitudinal change rather than merely reflecting it

Evidence

The paper’s central contribution to cascade analysis is its documentation of comparative normative-shift data: the comparison of Swedish pre- and post-prohibition attitudinal surveys with contemporaneous surveys in non-prohibiting countries of similar income and cultural profile shows that the normative shift that occurs in prohibiting countries significantly exceeds the normative shift that occurs in non-prohibiting countries over equivalent time periods. This finding confirms that legal prohibition drives normative change rather than merely reflecting it — that the law is doing causal work on population attitudes, not simply ratifying an existing change. — , The Rod and the Child, 10919

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Law changes norms even when it never produces prosecutions — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 7224; Post-prohibition reporting surges reflect awareness, not rising maltreatment — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 7274; Legal prohibition plus community normative work shifted behavior even in a non-welfare-state, diverse society — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 7363 (+19 more)