Post-prohibition reporting surges reflect awareness, not rising maltreatment

Evidence

This interpretation is almost certainly incorrect. The increase in reports is most plausibly attributable to increased awareness: when a practice is legally prohibited and normatively condemned, people are more willing to recognize and report it. The same pattern appears in domestic violence data after legal reform — reporting increases as norms change, not because the behavior is necessarily more frequent. Swedish Socialstyrelsen data on confirmed serious maltreatment cases and child homicide rates do not show the corresponding increase that would be expected if the maltreatment was actually increasing. Reports went up; confirmed serious harm went down. — , The Rod and the Child, 7274

Categorization

  • XREF: Parallel to post-reform reporting spikes in domestic violence and similar legal-change contexts. — connects to: Prohibition laws work as normative signals, not criminal sanctions — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 10897; Legal prohibition shifts normalcy even for those who still practice the behavior — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 7963; Prohibitions without enforcement can make severe abuse harder to detect — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 7800 (+2 more)

Broader Connections