Student advocacy achieved collective recategorization of Iranians from legal whites to non-white SWANA

Evidence

In keeping with the testimony of the youth in this book, the language and claims of the UC SWANA resolution were a direct response to contradictory and politically frustrating experiences as “legal whites” and everyday racial others. On May 2, 2013, UC president Mark Yudof confirmed that “SWANA” would be, from that point forward, adopted in the race/ethnicity portion of the systemwide UC application. SWANA youth, mostly second-generation immigrants, had successfully banded together with the help of their peer allies at UC to pull off a large-scale feat of pan-ethnic racial recategorization that their generational predecessors were not able or interested to accomplish. In the words of the student advocates themselves, “We no longer have to be an ‘invisible minority’ in the eyes of the UC system. We no longer have to assimilate into a group of people we truly do not feel like we identify with. We are here, and we will be counted.” — Neda Maghbouleh, The Limits of Whiteness, 773

Categorization

  • XREF: This collective, institutionalized assertion of a chosen non-white essentialist category (SWANA) is the closest real-world case to strategic essentialism holding at the collective level — bears directly on the reader’s individual-vs-collective feasibility question. — connects to: Pan-ethnic student organizing achieved a formal racial recategorization in 2013 — Neda Maghbouleh, The Limits of Whiteness: Iranian…, 344; Iranian Americans are legally white but are routinely racialized as non-white in schools — Neda Maghbouleh, The Limits of Whiteness: Iranian…, 255; Second-generation Iranian American youth reject predicted assimilation because they see through their legal whiteness — Neda Maghbouleh, The Limits of Whiteness: Iranian…, 556 (+4 more)
  • QUESTION: Was SWANA adoption a strategic or sincerely-held essentialist claim, and does its institutional success make it more or less vulnerable to Spivak-style critique?
  • SEED: Angle: generational successors accomplished what predecessors weren’t ‘able or interested’ in — a natural history of when strategic essentialism becomes institutionalized and who benefits (recoding vs. mobility).

Broader Connections