State form only loosely correlates with style of racial rule

Evidence

These links, it must be stressed, are a matter of emphasis and nuance. So I am not suggesting that there were not those in coercive-based states committed to racial historicism, or those in capital-directed states rationalizing claims to superiority and practices of subjugation on naturalist grounds, just as there were resistant voices to both in either state form. But again there is no natural relation between the force or — David Theo Goldberg, The Racial State, 43

Related

• States vary in how strongly racial classification penetrates their institutional apparatus (similarity 0.84)
• The racial state is a template, not a fixed form (similarity 0.83)
• Modern racial states are constituted through the legal fashioning of racial categories (similarity 0.83)
• The modern state has been centrally shaped by racial formation and exclusion. (similarity 0.83)
• Racial states are conditions of being as well as governance structures. (similarity 0.83)
• Scholarship has largely ignored the state’s role in reproducing racism (similarity 0.82)
• Racial states are inherently violent, not merely exercises of power (similarity 0.82)
• States that promote violence must escalate coercion to maintain rule (similarity 0.82)
• Racial states speak through law yet can only institute racial arrangements brutally (similarity 0.82)
• Late nineteenth-century racial rule became rule through law rather than raw force (similarity 0.82)
• A racially conceived state can only express itself in racial terms (similarity 0.81)
• States are racial through population structuration, not personnel or policy (similarity 0.81)
• State character is deeply shaped in racial terms in contemporary states. (similarity 0.81)
• Racial states destabilize the very order they seek to impose (similarity 0.81)
• Racial states form and persist through relational positioning in a global colonial arrangement. (similarity 0.81)