Specialized legal regimes for organized labor do not extend rights to other groups
Evidence
Avoidance of speciļ¬c jurisprudence for demonstrations has an interesting pair of effects. When states create special legal regimes for strikes, trade unions, professional societies, or voluntary associations, to some extent they segregate the particular institution from more general deļ¬nitions of rights and obligations. That under speciļ¬ed legal conditions organized industrial workers have the right to lay down their tools does not necessarily authorize farm laborers, government employees, or university students to strike against farms, governments, or universities. ā Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1197
Categorization
- DEFINE: Introduces the distinction between special jurisprudence (segregating an institution) and general rights-based jurisprudence.
- corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim ā Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1197
- XREF: connects to: Rights are exercised through group membership like citizenship, not universal humanity ā Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt: Internationalā¦, 2059; Platform labor fragmentation does not inherently preclude collective worker action. ā Donatella della Porta et al., Mobilizing Against the Odds: Solidarityā¦, 17; Expulsion from rights-bearing community constitutes a different order than mere discrimination ā Sherene Razack, Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslimsā¦, 34
Broader Connections
- Rights are exercised through group membership like citizenship, not universal humanity
#corroborates(0.78) ā Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt, 2059 - Expulsion from rights-bearing community constitutes a different order than mere discrimination
#expands(0.75) ā Sherene Razack, Casting Out, 34 - Platform labor fragmentation does not inherently preclude collective worker action.
#qualifies(0.74) ā Donatella della Porta et al., Mobilizing Against the Odds, 17