Similar anti-Muslim harassment evidence can fail the severe-or-pervasive standard

Evidence

In Hafford v. Seidner, the Court granted summary judgment for the employer on a religious harassment claim despite evidence that a supervisor had accused the plaintiff of preparing for a “holy war,” mocked the Muslim greeting, and commented that the Muslim religion taught its followers to hate white people. — Sahar F. Aziz, Sticks and Stones, the Words That Hurt, 339

Categorization

• QUESTION: Contrasting Hafford (employer won) with Khan (plaintiff won) — the reader may want to know what outcome-determinative facts the Hafford court cited.
• XREF: connects to: Visible Muslim identity makes public harassment a routine risk — Naheed Ahmed, Measurement of Perceived Interpersonal…, 3; Hard evidence for Islamophobic exclusionary practices remains scarce and largely anecdotal — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 903

Broader Connections

• Hard evidence for Islamophobic exclusionary practices remains scarce and largely anecdotal #corroborates (0.82) — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 903
• Visible Muslim identity makes public harassment a routine risk #expands (0.72) — Naheed Ahmed, Measurement of Perceived Interpersonal…, 3