Sanctions designed for worst-case agents alienate the majority who comply voluntarily

Evidence

One strategy in institutional design is to start from the need to cope with the worst agents around—the so-called knaves—and to introduce sanctions that will serve even to control such antisocial types. … This deviant-centred strategy is subject to well-known difficulties, however, all of which derive from the fact that most people are not knaves—most are naturally responsive to legitimate demands—and that a pattern of sanctioning designed for knaves is liable to alienate such agents and reduce their degree of compliance. — Philip Pettit, Republicanism, 1279

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to game-theoretic work on sanctioning crowding out intrinsic motivation (Frey) and to institutional design literature on trust-based vs. control-based governance. — connects to: Blanket exclusion sanctions clash with communal settlement values and practical needs. — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 123; Sanctions targeting civilian populations are morally distinct from regime-targeted measures — Moustafa Bayoumi, How Does It Feel to Be a Problem? Being…, 1206; Majority decision-making involves coercion that must be minimized to protect freedom — Philip Mirowski & Dieter Plehwe (eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making…, 1183 (+7 more)

Broader Connections