Said’s claim that Europeans cannot know non-Europe was a radical novelty in criticism.

Evidence

Numerous writers had previously demonstrated the complicity of European cultural productions in the colonial enterprise, but only the most obscurantist indigenists and cultural nationalists had previously argued – surely, no writer with any sense of intellectual responsibility had ever accepted – that Europeans were ontologically incapable of producing any true knowledge about non-Europe. But Said was emphatic on this point, and he mobilized all sorts of eclectic procedures to establish it. — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory, 321

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the broader debate over postcolonial critique and the charge of essentializing the West that Ahmad later prosecutes against Said.
  • DEEPTHINKING: The observation that a critic can invert rather than dismantle the very binary of Europe/the rest — that anti-colonial knowledge production can reproduce a mirror-essentialism — is dense and standing.