Residential segregation was deliberately constructed, not natural or market-driven

Evidence

Segregation did not result from the “desires” of African Americans and other people of color (the “lifestyle” explanation), “impersonal market forces” (the “market dynamics” explanation), or as “a chance by-product of other socioeconomic processes,” explain Massey and Denton. Before 1900, for instance, “blacks and whites lived side by side in American cities” in the north—in places like as Chicago, Detroit, and Philadelphia—as well as in the south in cities like Charleston, New Orleans, and Savannah. However, at critical points between the end of the Civil War in 1865 and the passage of the Fair Housing Act in 1968, “white America chose to strengthen the walls of the ghetto.” During this time period, residential segregation was constructed and imposed through various public and private processes—discriminatory real estate practices, exclusionary and expulsive zoning, redlining, and white flight, among others—that both contained growing urban black populations and limited the mobility of blacks and other people of color. — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up, 340

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly counters the market-dynamics explanation the reader is weighing across the legal analysis. — connects to: Segregation can perpetuate itself silently with no active racist actor — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental…, 343; Color-blind policy would perpetuate racial segregation without affirmative dismantling — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental…, 342; Segregation was deliberately engineered through planning policy, not emergent preference. — Matthew D. Lassiter, The Suburban Origins of “Color-Blind”…, 21 (+12 more)

Broader Connections