Repertoires of contention are defined by a flexibility continuum from nonexistent to rigid

Evidence

Exactly how people draw on contentious repertoires remains variable and controversial. Think first about a repertoire’s flexibility. All performances that characterize the interaction among a specified set of collective actors constitute that set’s repertoire of contention. Repertoires vary from nonexistent to weak to strong to rigid. Each position on the continuum identifies a different relationship between the familiarity of a previous performance and the likelihood that it will again appear in a similar situation, ranging from no relationship to perfect repetition. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 258

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Precise definition of repertoire with the four-position continuum the reader needs.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 258
  • XREF: connects to: Repertoires are learned, clustered, and improvisational but finite — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 234; Contention forms are regime-bound but also historically embedded — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 231; Repertoire clustering stems from daily organization, contention history, and regime operations — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 270 (+4 more)

Broader Connections