Real inclusion in coalitions paradoxically requires marginalized groups to have separate space.

Evidence

Given the tendency of dominant group members to monopolize leadership roles and behave paternalistically (Munkres, 2008), Weldon (2006) and Einwohner et al. (2019) argue that inclusion, ironically, may also require marginalized groups to have their own separate space to organize, thus enabling them to further develop their own perspectives and expressions of issues, so as to counter the tendency for marginalized views to be overlooked or disregarded. — Michelle I. Gawerc, Coalition-building and the forging of…, 204

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Directly tests the reader’s core question: can solidarity across difference hold without flattening internal heterogeneity? This passage suggests separation inside solidarity is a mechanism, not a failure.
  • XREF: Connects to literature on caucuses in social movements and ‘separate organizing’ within feminist/anti-racist coalitions—echoes of black feminist autonomous organizing within second-wave movements. — connects to: Guaranteeing space for diverse identities can unite rather than fragment a movement.; Coalition members must freely voice distinct identities and ideologies to build trust. — Michelle I. Gawerc, Coalition-building and the forging of…, 231; Marginalized groups require imaginary re-territorialization before they can mobilize against exclusion — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity…, 228 (+3 more)

Broader Connections