Rational self-preservation conquers nature only by imitating nature’s own rigidity

Evidence

The ratio which supplants mimesis is not simply its counterpart. It is itself mimesis: mimesis unto death. The subjective spirit which cancels the animation of nature can master a despiritualized nature only by imitating its rigidity and despiritutalizing itself in turn. Imitation enters into the service of domination inasmuch as even man is anthropomorphized for man. — Theodor W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment, 63

Categorization

  • XREF: This paradox — reason as mimetic rigidity; domination internalized — is the kernel of the Frankfurt School account that Burns extends later. Direct founding formulation. — connects to: Formal logic’s either-or structure derives from the compulsion of self-preservation. — Theodor W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment, 47; Abstracting gods from natural elements is the first step toward dominating nature — Theodor W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment, 36; Both nature’s mechanism and history’s determinism oppress the modern self — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 163 (+20 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: The claim that enlightenment’s rational mastery is itself a form of mimesis-unto-death — the subject defeats nature by becoming it — is the densest single insight of the excursus.

Broader Connections