Established science rationalizes the prevailing world without altering its existential structure.

Evidence

A provocative statement, which is easily minimized, and I take the liberty of a possible overinterpretation. The statement does not refer simply to the fact that, in spite of non-Euclidean geometry, we still perceive and act in three-dimensional space; or that, in spite of the ā€œstatisticalā€ concept of causality, we still act, in common sense, in accord with the ā€œoldā€ laws of causality. Nor does the statement contradict the perpetual changes in the world of daily practice as the result of ā€œapplied mathematics.ā€ Much more may be at stake: namely, the inherent limit of the established science and scientific method, by virtue of which they extend, rationalize, and insure the prevailing Lebenswelt without altering its existential structure—that is without envisaging a qualitatively new mode of ā€œseeingā€ and qualitatively new relations between men and between man and nature. — Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man, 611

Categorization

  • XREF: This is the crux of one-dimensionality applied to science itself: even revolutionary science only extends the same experiential universe rather than envisioning qualitatively new modes of seeing. — connects to: All science necessarily functions as ideology because no thinker escapes subjective positioning — Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic…, 711; Rational self-preservation conquers nature only by imitating nature’s own rigidity — Theodor W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment, 63; Science must produce a legitimating philosophical discourse about its own rules — Jean-FranƧois Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on…, 87 (+3 more)
  • QUESTION: Marcuse acknowledges this is ā€˜a possible overinterpretation’ — worth chasing whether Husserl’s text actually licenses the stronger reading.

Broader Connections