Racially conservative Southern whites defecting explains all of the 1958-1980 Democratic decline

Evidence

After generations of loyalty, Southern whites left the Democratic party en masse in the second half of the twentieth century. To what extent did Democrats’ 1960s Civil Rights initiatives trigger this exodus, versus Southern economic development, rising political polarization or other trends that made the party unattractive to Southern whites? The lack of data on racial attitudes and political preferences spanning the 1960s Civil Rights era has hampered research on this central question of American political economy. We uncover and employ such data, drawn from Gallup surveys dating back to 1958. From 1958 to 1961, conservative racial views strongly predict Democratic identification among Southern whites, a correlation that disappears after President Kennedy introduces sweeping Civil Rights legislation in 1963. We find that defection among racially conservative whites explains all (three-fourths) of the decline in relative white Southern Democratic identification between 1958 and 1980 (2000). — Ilyana Kuziemko and Ebonya Washington, Why Did the Democrats Lose the South?…, 7

Categorization

  • XREF: This is the key empirical quantification for testing whether threatened privilege is never satiable — the exodus was driven specifically by the subset holding conservative racial views, suggesting a targeted, anticipatory status threat rather than diffuse dealignment. Connects to the reader’s broader threatened-privilege mobilization research agenda. — connects to: The full Southern Democratic decline is attributable to conservative-race defection alone — Ilyana Kuziemko and Ebonya Washington, Why Did the Democrats Lose the South?…, 7; Racially conservative white Southerners abandoned Democratic identification after 1964. — Ilyana Kuziemko and Ebonya Washington, Why Did the Democrats Lose the South?…, 1327; Racially conservative whites’ defection drove the Southern realignment (+7 more)
  • SEED: Angle: the ‘unpayable threat’ claim — Southern whites defect not over actual material loss but over (a) change in party signal on race in 1963 and (b) anticipated loss of status. Testable: did defection correlate with actual civil-rights victories or with the mere announcement of Kennedy’s legislative intent?

Broader Connections