Racial exclusion persists through institutions while personal relations integrate

Evidence

Race serves as invisible border line demarcating both who formally belongs or not and what can or cannot be said about it. The border line is inscribed not at the level of personal relation, of social and sexual intercourse or the excitement of avant-garde aesthetic expression, but in the crevices of political divides and formal relations of power, of institutional access and full membership in the polity, of educational standards and citizenship requirements. Nonracialism squeezing out any possibility of antiracism. — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 909

Categorization

  • SEED: The contact/institution gap as the key finding for the threatened-privilege generalization article: personal tolerance coexisting with institutional exclusion recurs across black and Muslim axes, suggesting a structural, not attitudinal, mechanism.
  • XREF: Connects to Allport’s contact hypothesis literature and to the reader’s hypothesis that status threat operates at institutional entry points, not interpersonal ones. — connects to: Forced proximity under rules of separation sustains racial disengagement without contact being absent — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 1829; Everyday interracial socializing coexists with unaddressed institutional and labor market discrimination — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 857; Racial order enforces social apartness despite forced physical proximity — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 1829 (+8 more)

Broader Connections