Protection is a double-edged commodity blending shelter with extortion

Evidence

Violence is a means, not an end; a resource, not the final product. The commodity that is really at stake is protection. It may be argued that ultimately protection rests on the ability to use force, but it does not follow that it coincides with it. Protection is an ambiguous commodity. As Charles Tilly writes: “The word protection sounds two contrasting tones. One is comforting, the other ominous. With one tone ‘protection’ calls up images of the shelter against danger provided by a powerful friend, a large insurance policy, or a sturdy roof. With the other, it evokes the racket in which a local strong man forces merchants to pay tribute in order to avoid damage—damage the strong man himself threatens to deliver” (1985: 170). — Diego Gambetta, The Sicilian Mafia The Business of…, 12

Categorization

Category: Definitional Content

  • DEFINE: Gambetta’s core conceptual move: protection as the real commodity, not violence, citing Tilly’s two tones.
  • XREF: Directly feeds the reader’s Milgrom private-judge framing and Schelling credible-commitment analysis.

Broader Connections