Progressive think tanks rarely target Islamophobia critically as right-wing ones do.
Evidence
It should therefore come as no surprise that these individuals talk to one another and vie for influence within the broader political arena. When they disagree it is typically around strategy or rhetoric; they all share the overall aim of maintaining US hegemony. For instance, back in the 1950s when the Orientalists were arguing that Islam and Communism were incompatible, the newly formed CFR (founded in 1954) took a position against this thesis. … Islam cannot be counted on to serve as such a barrier [to the USSR]. The theory that communism and Soviet influence could never make inroads in the Moslem world because they are materialistic and atheistic has not been borne out. Religion does have a significant place in Middle Eastern society. It colors both popular and official attitudes. But it does not establish absolute immunity to a political virus such as fascism or communism. … In short, CFR offered a realist view of how the United States might maintain its power in the Middle East. This is a difference of strategy, not of goals and outcomes. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 461 (
#expands, via linked claim)
Categorization
- XREF: connects to: Early US think-tank debate treated Islam instrumentally, not ideologically — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 461
Broader Connections
- Early US think-tank debate treated Islam instrumentally, not ideologically
#expands(0.80) — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 461