Prejudice targets are caught between heritage and dominant worldviews, destabilizing meaning.

Evidence

In an important sense, targets of prejudice are caught between two worldviews: the traditional beliefs and values of their ethnic heritage and the views and standards espoused in the dominant culture. Confronted with this conflict, individuals may have a hard time figuring out what beliefs are truly meaningful and what it really means to be a person of value. — Jeff Greenberg and Spee Kosloff, Terror Management Theory, 73

Categorization

  • QUESTION: The passage frames the bind as between two substantive worldviews — there’s no mention of a worldview with only negation, which bears directly on the reader’s review question.
  • XREF: Dual-worldview fracture echoes W.E.B. Du Bois’s ‘double consciousness’ and internalized otherness frameworks. — connects to: Contradictory cultural norms force individuals into conflicting prejudiced and egalitarian stances. — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years…, 1904; Prejudices cannot be understood apart from a society’s history and contradictions — Cristian Tileagă, The Nature of Prejudice: Society,…, 59; Culture’s competing prejudiced and anti-prejudice norms drive bias into subtle forms. — Cristian Tileagă, The Nature of Prejudice: Society,…, 229 (+3 more)

Broader Connections