Prejudice research must integrate evolutionary, cultural, and historical levels of analysis.

Evidence

The study of ‘stubborn’ prejudices is left to the sociologist or political scientist. As I have shown in this book, the social psychologist who sets out to understand the nature and complexity of contemporary racism in Europe can profi tably turn to sociology, social theory, anthropology and history to understand more about the dilemmas and contradictions lodged at the heart of liberal democratic societies. — Cristian Tileagă, The Nature of Prejudice, 802 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Understanding prejudice requires cultural, not merely psychological, analysis — Cristian Tileagă, The Nature of Prejudice: Society,…, 806; Prejudice should be studied as collective societal thinking rather than only individual psychology — Cristian Tileagă, The Nature of Prejudice: Society,…, 55; Prejudice is explained by societal characteristics, not only individual traits — Cristian Tileagă, The Nature of Prejudice: Society,…, 81 (+1 more)

Broader Connections

• Understanding stubborn prejudice requires turning to sociology, history, and anthropology #expands (0.92) — Cristian Tileagă, The Nature of Prejudice, 802