Preference for digressive over competitive victimhood persists beyond general conservative ideology.

Evidence

To test the robustness of this effect and show that this preference holds over and above support for conservative beliefs in general, we also conducted a mixed effects ANOVA where we tested the effect of condition on endorsement with participant-level fixed effects and political ideology as controls. In this model, we showed that over and above the significant effect of political ideology (F(1, 465) = 246.73, p < .001, η2 p = 0. — Felix Danbold, Ivuoma N. Onyeador, and Miguel M. Unzueta, Dominant groups support digressive…, 60

Categorization

  • XREF: The huge ideology effect (η2=0.317) alongside the tiny condition effect speaks to the reader’s question of whether this mechanism is genuinely distinct from plain right-wing politics or just one facet of it. — connects to: Outgroup prejudice predicts support for both competitive and digressive victimhood; Digressive victimhood shifts debate to a different dimension of suffering rather than denying bias — Felix Danbold, Ivuoma N. Onyeador, and Miguel M. Unzueta, Dominant groups support digressive…, 22; Support for digressive victimhood claims tracks outgroup prejudice. — Felix Danbold, Ivuoma N. Onyeador, and Miguel M. Unzueta, Dominant groups support digressive…, 102 (+2 more)
  • QUESTION: Is digressive victimhood actually dissociable from conservatism, or is the small condition effect mostly riding a bigger ideological tailwind?

Broader Connections