Majority Christians endorse religious-freedom victimhood claims more than claims that Christians themselves are victims.

Evidence

We conducted a within-subjects t-test to compare the endorsement of the digressive victimhood claim (religious freedom is the victim) rela­ tive to the competitive victimhood claim (Christians are the victim). Participants endorsed the digressive victimhood claim (M = 4.70, SD = 1.81) more than the competitive victimhood claim (M = 4.59, SD = 1.80, t(462) = −2.22, p = .027, d = 0.102). — Felix Danbold, Ivuoma N. Onyeador, and Miguel M. Unzueta, Dominant groups support digressive…, 59

Categorization

  • QUESTION: The effect size is tiny (d=0.102) despite significance — worth noting how small the preference gap actually is vs. the theoretical weight it’s given.
  • XREF: connects to: A majority, advantaged group reports feeling more victimised than the minority it once victimised. — R. C. Tripathi, R. Kumar, and V. N. Tripathi, When the Advantaged Feel Victimised:…, 52; An advantaged Hindu majority reports stronger collective victimhood than the Muslim minority — R. C. Tripathi, R. Kumar, and V. N. Tripathi, When the Advantaged Feel Victimised:…, 2; Dominant-group members endorse digressive victimhood claims more than competitive ones — Felix Danbold, Ivuoma N. Onyeador, and Miguel M. Unzueta, Dominant groups support digressive…, 90 (+1 more)

Broader Connections