Postmodern society is a pragmatics of heterogeneous language games, not a Newtonian system.

Evidence

Thus the society of the future falls less within the province of a Newtonian anthropology (such as stucturalism or systems theory) than a pragmatics of language particles. There are many different language games—a heterogeneity of elements. They only give rise to institutions in patches—local determinism. — Jean-François Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition, 90

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Establishes the language-games / local determinism framework as postmodern sociality’s organizing principle.
  • XREF: Lyotard’s ‘language games’ derive from Wittgenstein; this is the point where he departs from structuralist ‘Newtonian’ totalizing — a key disagreement Jameson critiques. — connects to: Social language games are heteromorphous with no common metaprescriptions — Jean-François Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on
, 449; Heterogeneous language games yield only patchy, local institutional determinism. — David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity: An
, 331; Postmodernism’s rejection of unified representation leads logically to pragmatic localism. — David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity: An
, 353 (+6 more)

Broader Connections