Political allegiance rests on continuous acknowledgement, not rational consent.

Evidence

As Michael Oakeshott has reminded us, the auchority of political institutions is not a question of consml but of the continuous acknowledgement of dves who recognize their obligation to obey the conditions prescribed in Tn publka.ll Following that line of thought we can realize that what is really at stake in the allegiance to democratic institutions is the constitution of an ensemble of practices that make possible the creation of democratic citizens. This is not a matter of rational justifictZtitm but of availability of democratic forms of individuality and subjectivity. — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 432

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Worth chasing: does the ‘availability of democratic forms of individuality’ still presuppose demarcation from an enemy to be viable?
  • XREF: connects to: Status is granted by others’ recognition, never claimed unilaterally. — W. David Marx, Status and Culture: How Our Desire for…, 194; A nation is held together by consent, not by blood or geography — Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 2189; Democratic allegiance is secured through practices of persuasion, not arguments for universal validity — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 302 (+4 more)

Broader Connections