Policy documents omitting Islamophobia are disingenuous given pervasive anti-Islam discourse

Evidence

It seems to me circuitous and disingenuous to omit Islamophobia from explicit mention in such formats: much more so when the wider context of negative associations centring on ‘Islam’ and ‘Islamic’ is taken into consideration. Anti-Muslim hatred cannot be divorced from the pervasiveness of anti-Islam discourses, in our print media and as explanations for radicalization in our political discourse. — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 640

Categorization

  • XREF: This comment preserves the speaker’s ‘Islamophobia’ terminology against the policy turn to ‘anti-Muslim hatred’ — the reader can map this as the pro-Islamophobia camp responding to the racialization shift of the 2017 report. — connects to: Defining Islamophobia as ‘unfounded’ makes its denial subjectively defensible — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 657; the MOC “The Enemy-Making Machine: How Ourselves, the True, and Every Other Are Built from War”

Broader Connections