Pitch can be encoded by scalar firing rate rather than tuned vector codes

Evidence

The Matlab code in Section 13.6.1 produces the outputs plotted in Figure 13.12, demonstrating the effects of the different processing steps. Figure 13.12a shows the waveform of the vowel signal, and the outputs of the filter bank are shown in Figure 13.12b. The latter plot is often referred to as a cochleogram. In addition, the signals following the hair-cell processing are shown in Figure 13.12c, while the correlogram and the summary autocorrelation function are illustrated in Figure 13.12d. The last of the graphs shows a clear peak at 9 ms that corresponds to the fundamental frequency of 110 Hz of the vowel input. — Ville Pulkki, Matti Karjalainen, Communication Acoustics- An…, 1655 (#contradicts, via linked claim)

Two distinct models have been proposed to explain the perception of pitch: the place model and the temporal model. These two codes likely work in concert to produce the perception of pitch. For pure tones, the temporal model is likely the strongest for lowfrequency sounds and the place model for high-frequency sounds. — Jennifer Lentz, Psychoacoustics- Perception of Normal…, 1338 (#qualifies, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Pitch can be coded by neuron firing rate matching the repetition frequency; Neural pitch coding produces a butte of equal-rate activity centered on the stimulus frequency; Pitch may be jointly coded by temporal patterns and their cochlear location — Jennifer Lentz, Psychoacoustics- Perception of Normal…, 1338 (+4 more)

Broader Connections